In a recent strategy meeting we attended with the leaders of a Fortune-500 company, the word “culture” came up 27 times in 90 minutes. Business leaders believe a strong organizational culture is critical to success, yet culture tends to feel like some magic force that few know how to control. So most executives manage it according to their intuition.
We’ve found that answering three questions can help transform culture
from a mystery to a science: 1) How does culture drive performance? 2)
What is culture worth? 3) What processes in an organization affect
culture? In this article, we address each of these to show how leaders
can engineer high-performing organizational cultures — and measure their
impact on the bottom line.
How does culture drive performance?
After surveying over 20,000 workers around the world, analyzing 50
major companies, conducting scores of experiments, and scouring the
landscape of academic research in a range of disciplines, we came to one
conclusion: Why we work determines how well we work.
One 2013 study illustrates this well. Researchers asked almost 2,500 workers to analyze medical images for “objects of interest.” They told one group that the work would be discarded; they told the other group that the objects were “cancerous tumor cells.” The workers were paid per image analyzed. The latter group, or “meaning” group, spent more time on each image, earning 10% less, on average, than the “discard” group — but the quality of their work was higher. Reshaping the workers’ motive resulted in better performance.
Academics have studied why people work for nearly a century, but a
major breakthrough happened in the 1980s when professors Edward Deci and
Richard Ryan from the University of Rochester distinguished the six main reasons
why people work. We built on their framework and adapted it for the
modern workplace. The six main reasons people work are: play, purpose,
potential, emotional pressure, economic pressure, and inertia.
The work of many researchers has found that the first three motives
tend to increase performance, while the latter three hurt it. We found
that the companies most famous for their cultures — from Southwest
Airlines to Trader Joe’s — maximize the good motives, while minimizing the bad ones.
- Play is when you are motivated by the work itself. You work because you enjoy it. A teacher at play enjoys the core activities of teaching — creating lesson plans, grading tests, or problem solving how to break through to each student. Play is our learning instinct, and it’s tied to curiosity, experimentation, and exploring challenging problems.
- Purpose is when the direct outcome of the work fits your identity. You work because you value the work’s impact. For example, a teacher driven by purpose values or identifies with the goal of educating and empowering children.
- Potential is when the outcome of the work benefits your identity. In other words, the work enhances your potential. For example, a teacher with potential may be doing his job because he eventually wants to become a principal.
Since these three motives are directly connected to the work itself in some way, you can think of them as direct motives. They will improve performance to different degrees. Indirect motives, however, tend to reduce it.
- Emotional pressure is when you work because some external force threatens your identity. If you’ve ever used guilt to compel a loved one to do something, you’ve inflicted emotional pressure. Fear, peer pressure, and shame are all forms of emotional pressure. When you do something to avoid disappointing yourself or others, you’re acting on emotional pressure. This motive is completely separate from the work itself.
- Economic pressure is when an external force makes you work. You work to gain a reward or avoid a punishment. Now the motive is not only separate from the work itself, it is also separate from your identity.
- Finally, inertia is when the motive is so far removed from the work and your identity that you can’t identify why you’re working. When you ask someone why they are doing their work, and they say, “I don’t know; I’m doing it because I did it yesterday and the day before,” that signals inertia. It is still a motive because you’re still actually doing the activity, you just can’t explain why.
These indirect motives tend to reduce performance because you’re no longer thinking about the work—you’re thinking about the disappointment, or the reward, or why you’re bothering to do it at all. You’re distracted, and you might not even care about the work itself or the quality of the outcome.
We found that a high-performing culture maximizes the play, purpose,
and potential felt by its people, and minimizes the emotional pressure,
economic pressure, and inertia. This is known as creating total
motivation (ToMo).
Take, for example, an experiment
conducted by Teresa Amabile at Harvard. She assembled a group of poets
to write a simple short poem on the topic of laughter. Before they wrote
anything, she had one group read a list of “play” reasons for being a
poet (“you enjoy the opportunity for self-expression” or “you like to
play with words”), and she had the other group read a list of emotional
and economic pressure reasons (“you want your writing teachers to be
favorably impressed with your writing talent” or “you have heard of
cases where one bestselling novel or collection of poems has made the
author financially secure”). She found that the play group created poems
that were later deemed about 26% more creative than the poems of the
pressure group. The play group’s higher total motivation made a
difference when it came to performance.
How to Measure Total Motivation
What is culture worth?
Creating a business case for culture isn’t impossible. While it is
difficult to measure whether someone is being creative, proactive, or
resilient in the moment, it’s actually not difficult to calculate total
motivation. Using six questions, one for each motive, we can compute an
organization’s ToMo using very simple math (see the sidebar for the
calculation) and then determine its impact on performance.
Take for example the airline industry. Players share the same
terminals and use the same planes, but customer satisfaction differs
widely across carriers. When we measured the total motivation of
employees of four major airlines, and compared their cultures with an
outcome like customer satisfaction
(as measured by the ACSI / University of Michigan), we saw that an
organization’s culture (as measured by ToMo) tightly predicted customer
satisfaction.
In other words, cultures that inspired more play, purpose, and
potential, and less emotional pressure, economic pressure, and inertia,
produced better customer outcomes. We saw this play out in retail,
banking, telecommunications, and the fast food industry as well. And the
impact isn’t limited to customer satisfaction. In one hedge fund, the
highest performing portfolio managers had higher total motivation. And
in one retail organization we worked with, we found that the difference
between a low-ToMo and high-ToMo sales associate was 30% in revenues.
What processes in an organization affect culture?
We have asked thousands of managers how they would define a
high-performing culture. Most don’t have a great definition. So here is
one: Culture is the set of processes in an organization that affects the
total motivation of its people. In a high-performing culture, those
processes maximize total motivation. When we measured how different
processes affect employees’ total motivation, we learned a couple
things:
There is no silver bullet. Many processes affect people’s ToMo at work.
By surveying thousands of US workers, we measured how much the elements
of a workplace — from how a job is designed to how performance is
reviewed — affect ToMo.
What the chart shows is that while we tend to think that leadership
matters most to motivation, other processes can have an even bigger
impact. The x-axis shows the ToMo scale (which goes from -100 to 100).
The grey bars represent the range to which each process affects an
employee’s total motivation, as gathered from survey responses. For
example, how a role is designed can swing total
motivation by 87 points. A badly designed role results in ToMo scores as
low as almost -40, whereas a well designed role can result in a ToMo as
high as almost 50. That’s huge, given that in many industries, the
most-admired cultures tend to have 15 points higher ToMo than their
peers.
Some companies make special efforts to design a highly motivating
role. Toyota encourages play by giving factory workers the opportunity
to come up with and test new tools and ideas on the assembly line. W. L. Gore & Associates gives people free time and resources
to develop new ideas. And Southwest Airlines encourages their people to
treat each customer interaction as play — perhaps you’ve seen how some
flight attendants have turned boring safety announcements into comedy sketches.
The next most sensitive element is the identity of
an organization, which includes its mission and behavioral code. For
example, Medtronic enables its engineers and technicians to see the medical devices
they’ve made in action, so that they can see the purpose of their work.
The Chief Talent Officer at UCB Pharmaceuticals told us how he recently
started inviting patients to executive meetings, so the people making
decisions can see how their work makes a difference. And a Walmart
executive told us that he kicked off management meetings by reviewing
how much money his division had saved customers—rather than how much
money Walmart had made.
The third most sensitive element is the career ladder
in an organization. Recently, many companies have concluded that their
system of evaluating their people, which drives the promotion process,
tends to destroy performance. Systems where employees are stack-ranked
or rated against each other will increase emotional and economic
pressure, reducing total motivation and thus performance. As a result,
companies from Microsoft to Lear are moving away from performance review systems that foster unhealthy competition.
Culture is an ecosystem. The elements of culture
interact with and reinforce each other. One example is sales
commissions. In general, we found that having a sales commission
decreases the ToMo of an individual. However, if that individual also
believes that their work materially helps their customers, the
commission increases their ToMo. This makes sense through the
lens of total motivation: if you don’t believe in what you’re doing, the
commission becomes your motive. That’s low-ToMo. If you do believe in
what you’re doing, the commission is gravy. It may even help you track
your progress, increasing play. That’s high-ToMo.
What leaders can do
Looking at all these processes together, it’s clear that culture is
the operating system of an organization. Senior leaders can build and
maintain a high-performing culture by teaching managers to lead in
highly motivating ways. For example, one study of bank branch managers
showed that offering high-ToMo leadership training led to a 20% increase
in credit card sales and a 47% increase in personal loan sales. CEOs
should make a business case for culture (with a budget) and enlist HR
and business leaders to improve the elements that affect culture, from
role design to performance reviews.
Even without redesigning processes, however, team leaders can start improving the total motivation of their employees by:
- Holding a reflection huddle with your team once a week. Teams we’ve worked with hold an hour-long huddle once a week in which each person answers three questions directed at encouraging: 1) Play: What did I learn this week? 2) Purpose: What impact did I have this week? And 3) Potential: What do I want to learn next week?
- Explaining the why behind the work of your team. One executive at a retail store told us she often introduced a new project by saying, “We have to do this because Linda [the boss] asked for it.” This was motivating through emotional pressure, which was hurting her team’s performance. So she started explaining why a project would help the customer instead.
- Considering how you’ve designed your team’s roles. Does everyone have a space to play? Think about where people should be free to experiment and make that clear. For example, a Starbucks manager told us that he lets each employee experiment with how they connect to each customer, and a bank manager we worked with said he encourages people to suggest process improvements. Then ask if everyone has the opportunity to witness the impact of their work, and think about what might help them build a stronger purpose. Finally, find out where each team member would like to be in two years — and come up with a plan to help their reach their potential.
A great culture is not easy to build — it’s why high performing
cultures are such a powerful competitive advantage. Yet organizations
that build great cultures are able to meet the demands of the
fast-paced, customer-centric, digital world we live in. More and more
organizations are beginning to realize that culture can’t be left to
chance. Leaders have to treat culture building as an engineering
discipline, not a magical one.
[ Source ]
No comments :
Post a Comment