For the first time ever, a mainstream TV show has given a scholar the chance to discuss inaccuracies in the official version of events on 9/11.
C-SPAN’s Washington Journal morning program aired a 45-minute interview with Richard Gage, founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.
It is extremely rare for a mainstream media platform to give such an opportunity to anybody questioning the U.S. Congress-funded report by NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology). What makes this even more remarkable is that a qualified representative was able to speak at length, without interruption, about an alleged cover-up.
Within the interview, Gage explained that he believed there was “evidence of controlled demolition” of 7 World Trade Center. He discussed the uniformity of the symmetrical collapse, and the possibility of thermite being used to carry out such an attack. Reports of molten steel contradict the official cause given. Office fires would be unable to reach such temperatures, he said.
Gage went on to say once it is widely accepted that “the official story cannot be true”, we can move on to answering “very serious questions” about the twin towers too. Such issues, Gage lists, include independent scientists’ finding of Nanothermite in the Twin Towers’ dust. Combined with embedded nanoparticles of aluminum, he alleges this substance must have been made in a defense laboratory.
As a member of the American Institute of Architects, Gage has been a San Francisco Bay area architect for 25 years. He has worked on projects including numerous steel-framed, fire-proofed buildings.
Gage did not comment on why such a tragedy would be planned and carried out, and would only discuss the scientific inaccuracies in the official report. His non-profit organization Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth has 2,200 members in 32 countries, including many experts in high-rise engineering. The group is calling for an open and independent investigation into the events of 13 years ago.
Gage said every viewer should be calling their congressmen and senators and finding out why they are not adequately investigating “the worst mass murder in U.S. history, and the third worst structural failure in modern history”.
He points out the 9-11 Commission cannot be trusted, after claims from former members like Max Cleland that the investigation was set up to fail by the Bush administration, and intended deceive the U.S. public.
The interview host said The Washington Journal often received phone calls from viewers concerned about whether we were being given the truth or a narrative about the September 11 events.
Until now, such questioning of 9/11 has been omitted from mainstream media, and often completely maligned. A full, independent investigation would be a step forward for anyone, sceptic or not, who wants to know the truth behind the tragedy. Watch the interview at True Activist below.
Sources:
No comments :
Post a Comment